Skip to content
GitLab
  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • sac2c sac2c
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 334
    • Issues 334
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 12
    • Merge requests 12
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • External wiki
    • External wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • sac-group
  • sac2csac2c
  • Issues
  • #1684
Closed
Open
Created Oct 25, 2006 by Sven-Bodo Scholz@sbsOwner

wlsimp does not handle MOP-WLs

Bugzilla Link 314
Created on Oct 25, 2006 15:08
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on May 31, 2007 17:01
Version 1.00beta
OS SunOS
Architecture PC
Attachments foldfix.sac

Extended Description

this leads to an error UTBaseRep.sac (APEX).
There, a break operator is discarded along with a fold operator but the lhs is
NOT adjusted accordingly.
I think we should add full support for MOP-WLs even though, strictly speaking,
that seems not to be required right now. However, since we need to traverse
through a potential chain of operators anyways it should be rather simple to
make wlsimp generally applicable to MOP-WLs.
In case of empty partitions, we could simply create one (or none in case of
break) assignment for each operator and then replace the entire MOP-WL by this
new assignment chain.
(rev15061)
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking