Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • sac2c sac2c
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 336
    • Issues 336
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • External wiki
    • External wiki
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • sac-group
  • sac2csac2c
  • Issues
  • #1664

Closed
Open
Created Dec 05, 2005 by Robert Bernecky@rbeDeveloper

Fundef preliminary freed

Bugzilla Link 169
Created on Dec 05, 2005 23:02
Resolution FIXED
Resolved on Dec 07, 2005 14:00
Version 1.00beta
OS Linux
Architecture PC
Attachments tutu2.sac

Extended Description

I'm not sure if this is my doing or sac2c having fun.
1. I changed ArrayArith.sac RELationals from NUM to BUILT_IN,
   to get _neq_ and _eq_ defined on char arrays.
2. The attached dtb2.sac fails in several mysterious ways:
   a. sac2c -noOPT generates code that produces an invalid pointer on
    free(m), followed by a run-time error on the above code, unable to
    find a char[*]-> char[*]-> Bool[*] != function. Likely my doing, 
    but I don't see why it waits so long to complain.
   b. sac2c -O3 offers a vague complaint about negative shape vector
   elements, probably in the area of APEXReshape. I'm chasing this to
   inline the offending macro and see if I can suss it out.
sac2c rev#14459
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking