Sizes in MEMxxx functions are stored in ints

Bugzilla Link	1099
Created on	Oct 15, 2013 10:29
Version	svn
OS	All
Architecture	All

Extended Description

Well, first of all this is just wrong.
Secondly, size of int is not guaranteed to be as big as size of void *.  Normally it is the case, but in case it won't it will be a mess.
Thirdly, int is signed.
Proposal (1): change all sizes to size_t, matching behaviour of malloc, realloc and free.
Proposal (2): wouldn't it be nicer then to redefine malloc, realloc and free and use them without MEM prefix?
Question: MEMcopy function has weird arguments:
void *MEMcopy( int size, void *mem)
Currently it copies SIZE bytes starting from MEM into newly allocated piece of memory...  I would think that the function should be either renamed, or if not, it would be nice to match the arguments to the arguments of memcpy.