sac2c issueshttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues2017-11-19T20:44:05Zhttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1373Two bugs for the price of one2017-11-19T20:44:05ZRobert BerneckyTwo bugs for the price of one| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [193](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193) |
| Created on | Jan 20, 2006 19:03 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Jan 24, 2006 22:49 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [193](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193) |
| Created on | Jan 20, 2006 19:03 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Jan 24, 2006 22:49 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [UTIndexSet.sac](/uploads/3b68522edb3170404d5ca00b292abc5d/UTIndexSet.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>The attached fails in phase 9 of sac2c with illegal prf, if compiled with -O3.
If you compile it this way:
sac2c -DBUG UTIndexSet.sac
you get a failure due to someone not noticing that Y has been reassigned in
the function body.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1372type checker dies with useless error messaege2017-11-19T20:43:58ZRobert Berneckytype checker dies with useless error messaege| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [192](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192) |
| Created on | Jan 18, 2006 23:39 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Jan 20, 2006 23:30 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [192](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192) |
| Created on | Jan 18, 2006 23:39 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Jan 20, 2006 23:30 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [UTIndexSet.sac](/uploads/ede7a16f8f90630515cea761afd35248/UTIndexSet.sac), [xUTIndexSet.sac](/uploads/f9bf1167aeb199d6debef9058774868b/xUTIndexSet.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>I've griped about this before, but here I have a typechecker
complaint about a typing problem in a 947-line sac program.
There is NO information about where I might try starting to locate the
fault.
Even a teensy, weensy suggestion from the compiler as to what function(s)
it might have been looking at would help a LOT!</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1371loss of type precision due to fun2lac + lac2fun2017-11-19T20:43:52ZSven-Bodo Scholzloss of type precision due to fun2lac + lac2fun| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [184](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184) |
| Created on | Jan 09, 2006 15:30 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 20, 2009 01:22 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | All |
| Architect...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [184](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184) |
| Created on | Jan 09, 2006 15:30 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 20, 2009 01:22 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | All |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [tutu.sac](/uploads/ce66d1966b1fecb5231b67c1034d1d9b/tutu.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>This is a spin off bug from #180.
We potentilly loose type precision when converting
from and to SSA form.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1370Strange compiler diagnostic2017-11-19T20:43:45ZRobert BerneckyStrange compiler diagnostic| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [183](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183) |
| Created on | Jan 09, 2006 04:54 |
| Resolution | DUPLICATE |
| Resolved on | Jan 09, 2006 15:43 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Arc...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [183](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183) |
| Created on | Jan 09, 2006 04:54 |
| Resolution | DUPLICATE |
| Resolved on | Jan 09, 2006 15:43 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [UTBaseRep.sac](/uploads/8152d2faf55a1fc5e6088a50fa9bb1d8/UTBaseRep.sac), [crud.sac](/uploads/fe0ef53d6f3859776cd9bfff87033e99/crud.sac), [crud.txt](/uploads/672d270ab4da736be9280c291dbbbc07/crud.txt) |
## Extended Description
<pre>When I compile the attached .sac program, several interesting things happen:
1. If I compile UTBaseRep.sac, it spends a LONG time trying to optimize
main(), then eventually dies, complaining about _sel_ conformability
requrirements, which is very likely a legitimate source program bug.
2. If I compile crud.sac, I get the grumpy compiler failure noted in crud.txt.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1369Performance of sel sucks big time due to lack of AKD IVE2017-11-19T20:43:38ZKai TrojahnerPerformance of sel sucks big time due to lack of AKD IVE| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [182](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182) |
| Created on | Jan 05, 2006 11:52 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Jan 11, 2006 12:19 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archit...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [182](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182) |
| Created on | Jan 05, 2006 11:52 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Jan 11, 2006 12:19 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [selbug.sac](/uploads/5d0efe44cec89fe198a7f53a40673209/selbug.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>rev 14508. The performance of the attached example is seriously degraded due
argument a being AKD. With no with-loops present, the sole reason for the bad
performance is IVE's inability to optimize accesses to array a.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1368sac2c reports wrong line number on error2017-11-19T20:43:32ZRobert Berneckysac2c reports wrong line number on error| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [179](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179) |
| Created on | Jan 03, 2006 19:04 |
| Resolution | WORKSFORME |
| Resolved on | May 11, 2006 18:23 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Ar...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [179](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179) |
| Created on | Jan 03, 2006 19:04 |
| Resolution | WORKSFORME |
| Resolved on | May 11, 2006 18:23 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [UTIndexSet.sac](/uploads/c845f948d4721f565382d83dd6ec0a7a/UTIndexSet.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>The attached program claims to fail on line 1462, but actually
fails somewhat later. Build #14492.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1367Less than helpful error messages2017-11-19T20:43:26ZRobert BerneckyLess than helpful error messages| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [178](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178) |
| Created on | Dec 29, 2005 21:17 |
| Resolution | DUPLICATE |
| Resolved on | Jan 09, 2006 15:45 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Arc...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [178](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178) |
| Created on | Dec 29, 2005 21:17 |
| Resolution | DUPLICATE |
| Resolved on | Jan 09, 2006 15:45 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [bug20051229B.sac](/uploads/66ad7c4c401d157a8fadabbc499470a1/bug20051229B.sac), [bug20051229B.txt](/uploads/0436d323172497aa7e5a178d525864a7/bug20051229B.txt) |
## Extended Description
Compiler dies with mystery error message.
Probably a source program fault, but not clear where
to start looking.BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1366invalid prf2017-11-19T20:43:20ZRobert Berneckyinvalid prf| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [177](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177) |
| Created on | Dec 29, 2005 18:30 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | May 11, 2006 18:20 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [177](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177) |
| Created on | Dec 29, 2005 18:30 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | May 11, 2006 18:20 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [bug20051229.sac](/uploads/e96ebf4dc140ab3ebc1718a0c8e0e1a0/bug20051229.sac), [bug20051229.txt](/uploads/43a0e49f4acbb10949050612a16d734d/bug20051229.txt), [testir.sac](/uploads/daeb0b64ede23054ab5efd114a328a82/testir.sac) |
## Extended Description
See attached source code and compiler output.BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1365insufficient error messages2017-11-19T20:43:12ZRobert Berneckyinsufficient error messages| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [176](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176) |
| Created on | Dec 21, 2005 23:48 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Jan 10, 2006 12:30 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archit...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [176](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176) |
| Created on | Dec 21, 2005 23:48 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Jan 10, 2006 12:30 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [crc.sac](/uploads/913566b1fe10a5dabbcaf47909638996/crc.sac), [crcbug.txt](/uploads/c296f690c60e7d8d6d8125ef4dee625f/crcbug.txt) |
## Extended Description
<pre>Attached is a compiler diagnostic which I don't understand at all,
and the source code to bring it on.
Also, there's a similar sort of problem when nested WITH-LOOPS are
used and the compiler is grumping about generator versus default
cell shapes - it is not apparent (at least on this side of the pond)
which with-loop it's talking about.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1364CPU cycles - if you don't use them now, they're gone forever! ipape slowness2017-11-19T20:43:06ZRobert BerneckyCPU cycles - if you don't use them now, they're gone forever! ipape slowness| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [172](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172) |
| Created on | Dec 07, 2005 19:32 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Oct 24, 2006 14:41 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [172](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172) |
| Created on | Dec 07, 2005 19:32 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Oct 24, 2006 14:41 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [ipape.sac](/uploads/732ee9c7ecb6e50338b993b1851dfe43/ipape.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>I rewrote my slow character-character matrix product code to
use a quick-stop dotproduct, in hopes of speeding it up.
No such luck. The New, Improved algorithm runs BAGS slower
than the dumb transpose algorithm.
It does eventually give the right answer, though.
This problem may be similar to bug#142, even though the
inner loop is quite a bit different.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1363quick-stop inner product sends sac2c to optimizer heaven2017-11-19T20:43:00ZRobert Berneckyquick-stop inner product sends sac2c to optimizer heaven| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [171](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171) |
| Created on | Dec 07, 2005 18:14 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Dec 07, 2005 18:34 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archite...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [171](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171) |
| Created on | Dec 07, 2005 18:14 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Dec 07, 2005 18:34 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [crud.sac](/uploads/0cd60bc59774fc9da6fc6a98a8ad8589/crud.sac) |
## Extended Description
The attached code sends sac2c into an endless loop,
humming its optimization mantra: cycle cycle cycle...BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1362profiling does not work yet......2017-11-19T20:42:54ZRobert Berneckyprofiling does not work yet......| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [170](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170) |
| Created on | Dec 06, 2005 23:35 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Oct 24, 2006 16:04 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archite...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [170](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170) |
| Created on | Dec 06, 2005 23:35 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Oct 24, 2006 16:04 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [crud](/uploads/13f78c035c3cf31a325b3de32a1023ec/crud), [dtb2.sac](/uploads/6c5e236352cef1fdd0bd65d25e64330a/dtb2.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>The attached crud shows the failure mode when compiled with
sac2c -noOPT -profile a dtb2.sac
The attached dtb2.sac is the failing source code.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1361rbe unable to shift for himself2017-11-19T20:42:47ZRobert Berneckyrbe unable to shift for himself| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [168](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168) |
| Created on | Dec 03, 2005 22:19 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Dec 03, 2005 22:21 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [168](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168) |
| Created on | Dec 03, 2005 22:19 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Dec 03, 2005 22:21 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [shift.sac](/uploads/c74f6be71c56e0cedbc35c74e663dec8/shift.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>The attached program, when compiled with -O3 or with -noOPT,
produces no output (at least, none that I can see.) SAC rev 14458.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1360floating-point exception in ArrayTransform.sac [rotate integer vector]2017-11-19T20:42:42ZRobert Berneckyfloating-point exception in ArrayTransform.sac [rotate integer vector]| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [165](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165) |
| Created on | Dec 01, 2005 00:45 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | May 15, 2006 15:49 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archite...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [165](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165) |
| Created on | Dec 01, 2005 00:45 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | May 15, 2006 15:49 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [crud2.sac](/uploads/a14f53962967b9bd3e697824fd4c70bc/crud2.sac), [crud3.sac](/uploads/ef8305d233dc5a8b1d17b8dcb1c486f0/crud3.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>We have a sale on today:
Two bugs for the price of one:
a. If you compile the attached crud2.sac with -O3 +check tb,
sac2c dies a 'orrible death.
b. If you compile with -noOPT, the run-time rotate
in ArrayTransform.sac dies with a floating-point exception.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1359error in WLPG?2017-11-19T20:42:35ZSven-Bodo Scholzerror in WLPG?| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [163](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163) |
| Created on | Nov 29, 2005 13:14 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 18, 2009 23:58 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Solaris |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [163](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163) |
| Created on | Nov 29, 2005 13:14 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 18, 2009 23:58 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Solaris |
| Architecture | Sun |
| Attachments | [tutu.sac](/uploads/6bbd5967682c08709937483f9de9fde0/tutu.sac) |
## Extended Description
Empty generators seem to be discovered too late in some cases.BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1358WLIR considered harmfull2017-11-19T20:42:28ZSven-Bodo ScholzWLIR considered harmfull| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [161](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161) |
| Created on | Nov 28, 2005 14:08 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Nov 28, 2005 14:13 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Solaris |
| Arch...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [161](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161) |
| Created on | Nov 28, 2005 14:08 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Nov 28, 2005 14:13 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Solaris |
| Architecture | Sun |
| Attachments | [tutu2.sac](/uploads/21fe89c5f50c3aee4295cb01065a3937/tutu2.sac) |
## Extended Description
There is a conceptual problem with WLIR. If we lift invariant expressions
from partitions that turn out to be empty, we may change the termination
behaviour of the program adversly.BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1357Removing code slows down inner product2017-11-19T20:42:23ZRobert BerneckyRemoving code slows down inner product| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [160](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160) |
| Created on | Nov 26, 2005 23:32 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Nov 29, 2005 11:55 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [160](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160) |
| Created on | Nov 26, 2005 23:32 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Nov 29, 2005 11:55 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [ipbbslow.sac](/uploads/e00115c8d5c9c3ef6897b8aaaf8132ec/ipbbslow.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>ipbbslow.sac runs MUCH slower if you remove the trailing +/+/ from the code.
This is a Boolean matrix product algorithm, which generates a fairly large
(400x400) result. In order to get a rough idea of whether the code is producing
anything close to the right result, I sum the result rows and then sum that
result, to produce a scalar.
Now, here's the fun part:
1.If you run the code without the +/+/, it runs quite quickly (1.25 seconds).
2.If you run the code WITH the +/+/, it runs extremely slowly (several minutes).
The interesting fact is that, based on "print" statements, the thing that
is taking a long time not the +/+/, but the inner product that precedes it,
and that just ran really quickly.
I was going to make conjectures about the cause, but think I'll just
go have dinner instead.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1356Traversal into subtree NULL causes universe to end2017-11-19T20:42:17ZRobert BerneckyTraversal into subtree NULL causes universe to end| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [159](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159) |
| Created on | Nov 24, 2005 21:00 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 24, 2005 22:28 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archite...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [159](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159) |
| Created on | Nov 24, 2005 21:00 |
| Resolution | FIXED |
| Resolved on | Nov 24, 2005 22:28 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [ipbb.sac](/uploads/b754035c273ea8473647f1c0ca2cec76/ipbb.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>The attached sac program kills sac2c with -noOPT and
with sac2c -O3.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1355Simple benchmark crashes sac2c optimizer2017-11-19T20:42:11ZRobert BerneckySimple benchmark crashes sac2c optimizer| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [157](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157) |
| Created on | Nov 22, 2005 18:27 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Nov 28, 2005 23:04 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archi...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [157](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157) |
| Created on | Nov 22, 2005 18:27 |
| Resolution | INVALID |
| Resolved on | Nov 28, 2005 23:04 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [loopfv.sac](/uploads/43bb128576dc34012640dd7cc8aaba5a/loopfv.sac), [SACbugreport](/uploads/7dc632e893c19466e8b9a7215c7c68c3/SACbugreport) |
## Extended Description
<pre>Build 14421 (today) [How come build numbers are SMALLER than before, by
the way?] crashes in optimizer if compiled with sac2c -O3.</pre>BugZillaBugZillahttps://gitlab.sac-home.org/sac-group/sac2c/-/issues/1354lacking proper shape validity checking2017-11-19T20:42:04ZRobert Berneckylacking proper shape validity checking| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [156](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156) |
| Created on | Nov 21, 2005 04:39 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Nov 29, 2005 15:36 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Archit...| | |
| --- | --- |
| Bugzilla Link | [156](http://bugs.sac-home.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156) |
| Created on | Nov 21, 2005 04:39 |
| Resolution | REMIND |
| Resolved on | Nov 29, 2005 15:36 |
| Version | 1.00beta |
| OS | Linux |
| Architecture | PC |
| Attachments | [bug20051120b.sac](/uploads/f6ddf14e8de488f29b2e66740c6206e9/bug20051120b.sac) |
## Extended Description
<pre>The soon-to-be-attached source code causes a run-time error
if I compile with -check a, due to a silly thing like a negative
element in a shape vector.</pre>BugZillaBugZilla